"CWA Takes Christie to
Court Over Unconstitutional
Restriction on Workers' Political Participation"
CWA Takes Christie to Court Over Unconstitutional Restriction
on Workers'
Political Participation
TRENTON, NJ -- Four unions filed a legal challenge today
to Gov. Christie's
unilateral executive order that dramatically limits the ability of working
families to participate in the political process in New Jersey.
Christie's executive order, issued on January 20, 2010, attempts to expand
the state law regulating so-called "pay-to-play"contributions
by business entities to include labor unions that are party to collective
bargaining agreements with the state.
"Christie is trying to govern by fiat, bypassing
the legislature and making
up new laws as he sees fit. That's not the way democracy is supposed
to
work," said Hetty Rosenstein, state director for the Communications
Workers of America. "And if that's not bad enough, he's wielding
that
unconstitutional power to take away the First Amendment free speech and
associational rights of working families to participate in the political
process."
A formal legal opinion issued last week by the State
Legislature's Office of
Legislative Services came to a similar conclusion. The legal opinion,
issued on February 16, states: "[It] is our opinion that Executive
Order No.
7 violates the separation of powers provision of the New Jersey
Constitution... [T]he pay-to-play laws do not confer on the Governor
the
authority to exclude unions from representing public employees because
of campaign contributions."
The State's largest citizen watchdog coalition, New Jersey
Citizen Action
(NJCA), agreed: "Governor Christie's executive order is clearly
unconstitutional and represents a dangerous attempt to silence the voice
of working-class New Jerseyans," said Ev Liebman, director of organizing
and advocacy of NJCA.
The unions' legal brief argues the executive order:
violates separation of powers principles because it represents the
quintessential exercise of legislative power.
violates the First Amendment of the United States Constitution
and similar
provisions of the New Jersey Constitution.
violates the Equal Protection guarantees of the Fourteenth
Amendment of the United States Constitution
impermissibly expands the definition of "business
entity" in the existing
pay-to-play statute
incorrectly treats collective negotiations agreements
as if they were
contracts and agreements covered by the pay-to-play statute
imposes pay-to-play restrictions on local government
entities, that far
exceed the statutory framework, and
improperly amends and/or repeals sections of the Employer
Employee Relations Act.
The unions bringing legal action today include CWA, AFSCME,
the
International Federation of Professional and Technical Employees-Local
195 and the American Federation of Teachers. The unions are asking the
Appellate Division court to stay the implementation of Christie's order. |